On Monday, July 16, 2012, Toralf Förster wrote: > > On 07/16/2012 07:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Well, so this is a different issue definitely. > > > Well, this helped : https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/16/113
So, it was the same issue after all. The patch has been merged, so it should be all good now. Thanks, Rafael > diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > index 269b1fe..3447cfa 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void) > timekeeper.clock->cycle_last = > timekeeper.clock->read(timekeeper.clock); > timekeeper.ntp_error = 0; > timekeeping_suspended = 0; > + timekeeping_update(false); > write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper.lock, flags); > > touch_softlockup_watchdog(); > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
