Yep, it is libc5. i have 1 glibc system and they both have the files
you've mentioned. :( either i'll have to upgrade to glibc (no small task)
or use 8.2.3 for now..the previous 8.2.2 series was compiling ok for me.
Unless someone has a workaround i might try for 9?
-Tony
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services
"Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
http://www.asteroid-b612.org http://www.intergrafix.net
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Admin Mailing Lists]
> > i have no bits directory
>
> Really? What version of libc, and on what Linux distro? I thought all
> versions of glibc2 had /usr/include/bits/.
>
> If you are using libc4 or libc5, it is not surprising if the BIND
> people didn't notice the problem -- they probably didn't try it.
>
> Peter
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
