On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 00:02 -0700, Jon Mason wrote: > Use PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL from pci_ids.h instead of creating its own > vendor ID #define. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdma...@kudzu.us> > Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> > Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeb...@intel.com> > Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.al...@intel.com> > Cc: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wybo...@intel.com> > Cc: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidm...@intel.com> > Cc: Greg Rose <gregory.v.r...@intel.com> > Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz...@intel.com> > Cc: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.du...@intel.com> > Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronc...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h | 3 --- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Same goes for this patch as well (not being trivial). I already have several patches submitted for Dave against ixgbe currently and I am not sure if there would be any issues with this patch applying on top of the currently submitted patches. I will verify this applies cleanly with no issue to my current net-next tree before I send my ACK.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
