On Wed, 25 July 2012 09:17:09 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> As far as I know there is nothing like netpoll in the block layer so it has 
> to 
> be a lot less reliable than netconsole. Especially with delaying write out to 
> a workqueue. Anyway, I am not arguing, just saying in my opinion those 
> caveats 
> are worth documenting.
...
> My point was that it's reliability will differ depending on the block device 
> in use, which is unlike netconsole. Again I am not arguing against the 
> feature, but if you don't see things like these are worth documenting I give 
> up.

I have nothing against documenting things.  Can you suggest something
better than "reliability of blockconsole will depend on the
reliability of the underlying storage layer", which sounds rather
obvious?

Jörn

--
I don't understand it. Nobody does.
-- Richard P. Feynman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to