In the original code
...
        if ((adapter->hw.mac.type == e1000_i210)
                || (adapter->hw.mac.type == e1000_i210)) {
...
the second check of 'adapter->hw.mac.type' is pointless since it tests
for the exact same value as the first.

After reading through a few other parts of the driver I believe that
the second check was actually intended to check for 'e1000_i211'
rather than 'e1000_i210', but I admit that I'm not certain so someone
with more knowledge about this driver should ACK the patch before it
gets merged.

Unfortunately I have no hardware to actually test this on, so it is
compile tested only.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
index a19c84c..ad489b7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c
@@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ static int igb_loopback_test(struct igb_adapter *adapter, 
u64 *data)
                goto out;
        }
        if ((adapter->hw.mac.type == e1000_i210)
-               || (adapter->hw.mac.type == e1000_i210)) {
+               || (adapter->hw.mac.type == e1000_i211)) {
                dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
                        "Loopback test not supported "
                        "on this part at this time.\n");
-- 
1.7.11.3


-- 
Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to