On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:02:26PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Hummm. Where are the patches for 2.4 to correct this? They are not posted
> > with the 7.1 release. They need to be. The compiler not supporting
>
> They don't need to be because the thing is just a warning. The kernel has
> plenty of warnings and this one is 100% harmless.
>
> > #ident for CVS is a show stopper, and needs correcting ASAP. How can
> > someone use CVS properly with this, Alan?
>
> Im using CVS all the time. Im not sure what the #ident thing would be. But
> then like everyone else I know I use $ident in comments. JJ will probably
> be glad to work on that one
I sent him the code and he is running it down. It works great on
gcc 2.91.
Jeff
>
> Right now I'm down to one known problem with 2.96 and 2.4.x kernels - which
> is that CVS gcc and 2.96 accidentally changed the ABI and broke the bitfield
> assumptions in DAC960.c/h. JJ I believe just committed patches for that one
>
:-)
Jeff
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
