Consider the following code in tcp_input.c
-----------------------------------------------------------------
static int
tcp_time_to_recover(struct sock *sk, struct tcp_opt *tp)
{
/* Trick#1: The loss is proven. */
if (tp->lost_out)
return 1;
/* Not-A-Trick#2 : Classic rule... */
if (tcp_fackets_out(tp) > tp->reordering)
^^^^^^^^^
return 1;
/* Trick#3: It is still not OK... But will it be useful to delay
* recovery more?
*/
if (tp->packets_out <= tp->reordering &&
tp->sacked_out >= max(tp->packets_out/2, sysctl_tcp_reordering) &&
!tcp_may_send_now(sk, tp)) {
/* We have nothing to send. This connection is limited
* either by receiver window or by application.
*/
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
----------------------------------------------------
Shouldn't it be a >= instead of > ?
Ramana
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
