On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:45:04 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Unless Aneesh has another reason for the patch, it should be reverted > > to preserve hugetlb page sharing locking. > > > > I guess we want to take this patch as a revert patch rather than > dropping the one in -mm. That would help in documenting the i_mmap_mutex > locking details in commit message. Or may be we should add necessary > comments around the locking ? Code comments would be better if possible - we shouldn't force people to dig around in git history to understand small code snippets. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
