On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:12:39PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Sorry for long delay
> [resend with fixed Greg's address :)]
> 
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:54:29PM +0200, Daniel Mack (zon...@gmail.com) 
> wrote:
> > In the process of porting boards to devicetree implemenation, we should
> > keep information about external circuitry where they belong - the
> > individual drivers.
> > 
> > This patch adds a way to specify a GPIO to drive the (optional) external
> > pull-up logic, rather than using a function pointer for that.
> 
> I do not object against this patch, but I have rather limited knowledge
> about gpio driver. Patch looks good, feel free to add my
> Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <z...@ioremap.net>
> 
> Greg, please pull it into your tree, if Ville does not object.

No objections from me.

The only cosmetic issue I spotted was 'pdata' being assigned twice in
w1_gpio_probe().

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
syrj...@sci.fi
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to