On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:12:39PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Hi > > Sorry for long delay > [resend with fixed Greg's address :)] > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:54:29PM +0200, Daniel Mack ([email protected]) > wrote: > > In the process of porting boards to devicetree implemenation, we should > > keep information about external circuitry where they belong - the > > individual drivers. > > > > This patch adds a way to specify a GPIO to drive the (optional) external > > pull-up logic, rather than using a function pointer for that. > > I do not object against this patch, but I have rather limited knowledge > about gpio driver. Patch looks good, feel free to add my > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]> > > Greg, please pull it into your tree, if Ville does not object.
No objections from me. The only cosmetic issue I spotted was 'pdata' being assigned twice in w1_gpio_probe(). -- Ville Syrjälä [email protected] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
