On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:47:24PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > ... though it occurs to me that it is possible that the GPIO number might not > be allocated until something else has been probed, so a -ve gpio number could > mean "there is no such gpio" or it could mean "gpio has not been allocated > yet". I wonder if that should be allowed and where it should be handled.
If there's logic to do things like that I'd > I'd really like to see gpios be requested by name ... anyone know if there > are any plans along that line? I've not noticed anyone doing much substantial work on GPIO recently. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/