On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:26:07PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 04:22:17PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:13:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > __devinit can be discarded if you disable enough kernel features,
> > > HOTPLUG is the main one IIRC, modules might also need to go - drivers
> > > really ought to take a copy of platform data they plan to use at
> > > runtime, though practically speaking you have to try to trigger any
> > > problems.
> 
> > HOTPLUG is marked EXPERT and explicitly states that it should only be
> > disabled if you're not using modules or dynamic device discovery. I
> > think if you've ignored all of that you're no longer entitled to
> > complain.
> 
> This is framework code - it doesn't have much option.  Disabling HOTPLUG
> is totally reasonable on space constrained systems, there's no reason
> for the code to break things for people.

Still if you use this code and disable HOTPLUG, then you shouldn't be
using modules either. I mean there is no way you can write a driver that
can gracefully handle its platform data being discarded.

Thierry

Attachment: pgp2FoO08NGHH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to