On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:50:59 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Right now we have support for explicit platform device IDs, as well as
> > ID-less platform devices when a given device type can only have one
> > instance. However there are cases where multiple instances of a device
> > type can exist, and their IDs aren't (and can't be) known in advance
> > and do not matter. In that case we need automatic device IDs to avoid
> > device name collisions.
> > 
> > I am using magic ID value -2 (PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO) for this, similar
> > to -1 for ID-less devices. The automatically allocated device IDs are
> > global (to avoid an additional per-driver cost.) We keep note that the
> > ID was automatically allocated so that it can be freed later.
> > 
> > Note that we also restore the ID to PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO on error and
> > device deletion, to avoid avoid unexpected behavior on retry. I don't
> > really expect retries on platform device addition, but better safe
> > than sorry.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> 
> Looks sane to me, want me to queue it up for 3.7?

Yes, please!

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to