On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:31:21PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:28:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The changes you're suggesting are extremely invasive for stable > > especially given that we have a simple, driver local, fix available > *Rubbish*. This isn't helpful or constructive... Which bit of the above are you referring to here? If it's the having a fix bit then as pointed out repeatedly now in this and the previous thread we've got the separete resource tree approach implemented in stable right now making actual systems run. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
