Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:12:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its own; it wants
> to be compared to either a total of interleave allocations or to a miss
> count, remove it.
>
> Fixing it would be possible, but since we've gone years without these
> statistics I figure we can continue that way.
>
> Also NUMA_HIT fully includes NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT so users might
> switch to using that.
>
> This cleans up some of the weird MPOL_INTERLEAVE allocation exceptions.
It's not apparent why you need to remove it for sched-numa. I think I
see it but it'd be nicer if it would explained so one doesn't need to
read an internal bit of several patches later to understand why this
is needed.
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static ssize_t node_read_numastat(struct
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_HIT),
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_MISS),
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_FOREIGN),
> - node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT),
> + 0UL,
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_LOCAL),
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_OTHER));
> }
Not so nice to leave forever a 0 here. It doesn't matter if nobody can
act on it because it wants to be compared, it's still useful as an
informative value for vmstat below:
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -717,7 +717,6 @@ const char * const vmstat_text[] = {
> "numa_hit",
> "numa_miss",
> "numa_foreign",
> - "numa_interleave",
> "numa_local",
> "numa_other",
> #endif
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
