On 08/16/2012 04:30 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 16:15 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> There are some optimizations I can do here, but lets for now just do >> the sb->s_lock thing, and I might decide to completely revamp the >> all thing later. > > OK. But I guess an exofs-specific mutex could be used instead. We do not > have to depend on 'sb->s_lock'. >
sorry I meant sbi->s_lock. But I'm fine with the complete drop now Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
