Hello again,
When i originally posted this, it was _highly_ OT. the machine in question
runs windows ME, but i figured the best place to find hardware gurus was
here.
the topic has rather degraded, and while i enjoy getting mail from alan,
the fact that it has nothing to do with me dampens the enthusiasm =)
if you're going to go changing the subject, at least mention framebuffers,
as that seems to be the common thread.
if you all could de-cc me on these, it'd be appreciated.
--
- josh
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, george anzinger wrote:
> I may be off base here, but the problem as described below does _NOT_
> seem to be OT so I removed that from the subject line. A clock drift
> change with an OS update is saying _something_ about the OS, not the
> hardware. In this case it seems to be the 2.4.x OS that is loosing
> time. I suspect the cause is some driver that is not being nice to the
> hardware, either by abusing the interrupt off code or locking up the bus
> or some such. In any case I think it should _not_ be considered OT.
>
> George
--
/jbm, but you can call me Josh. Really, you can.
Rap-Rock is neither Modern nor Alternative.
Not that I'm bitter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
