> That's the whole crux of the matter. For something like this, you *will* > drop data under certain circumstances. I suspect it's better to have > this done in a controlled manner, rather than stop completely, which is > what TCP would do. Why do you plan to drop data ? That seems unneccessary. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Werner Almesberger
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Tim Wright
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Russell King
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox