>>> Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> 08/19/12 4:59 AM >>>
>I verified this generates the same binary (on 64bit) as the original
>register variable.
This isn't very surprising given that the modified code is inside a
CONFIG_X86_32 conditional (as ought to be obvious from the code using
%%esp). Given that it's being used as operand to a binary &, the resulting
code - if the compiler handles this only half way sensibly - can hardly be
expected to be identical.
>-register unsigned long current_stack_pointer asm("esp") __used;
>+#define current_stack_pointer ({ \
>+ unsigned long sp; \
>+ asm("mov %%esp,%0" : "=r" (sp)); \
>+ sp; \
>+})
It would get closer to the original if you used "=g" (I noticed in a few
earlier patches already that you like to use "=r" in places where a register
is not strictly required, thus reducing the flexibility the compiler has).
Also, given that this is more a workaround for a compiler deficiency,
shouldn't this be conditional upon use of LTO?
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
