Manfred Spraul wrote:
> "N. Jason Kleinbub" wrote:
>> People,
>>
>> Not sure where to go from here but ....
>>
>> ( Yes I have read the FAQ )=
>>
>> For practical reasons, I have created some modification to the
>> Linux kernel. These changes were to make our implementation of
>> software more convenient (elegant). Essentially, I have modified the
>> select() calls to allow the non-trivial use of directories as an 'fd'.
>>
> Have you checked the F_NOTIFY fcntl()?
>
> If yes, what's the difference between your patch and F_NOTIFY?
The biggest impediment that I saw with F_NOTIFY was the inability
to distinguish _which_ directory generated the signal. This was
especially problematic for multithreaded apps. Also I would have
a chance of missing the signal if they pile ontop of each other.
Everytime I was interupted from my sleep() by a signal I would
have to scan _each_ directory to find the next file.
I admit, however, that the current F_NOTIFY has more functionality
then the current select().
Plus, for our programmers, it is a stylistic choice. They prefer,
and better understand, using select()/poll() versus signal io.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
