On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:31:08AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There was a plan to place ab8500_irq_get_virq() calls in each AB8500 > > child device prior to requesting an IRQ, but as we're no longer using > > Device Tree to collect our IRQ numbers, it's actually better to allow > > the core to do this during device registration time. So the IRQ number > > we pull from its resource has already been converted to a virtual IRQ. > > > > CC: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> > > CC: [email protected] > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > > This is looking good, I guess you need all patches to go in at the > same time so Dmitry's ACK is required.
Yep, just waiting for that now. > FWIW: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > > BTW: this makes me suspect that the public ab8500_irq_get_virq() > interface can be *deleted* and the function made static in the > AB8500 driver, right? Right. Already taken care of. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
