>>>>> " " == stergaard <Jakob> writes:
> What happens is that one machine will finish compiling, and
> another machine will immediately thereafter do a "touch
> some_output.o". This "touch" sometimes fails with a stale
> handle message.
Does the appended patch change anything?
Cheers,
Trond
--- linux-2.4.1/fs/nfs/inode.c.orig Tue Dec 12 02:46:04 2000
+++ linux-2.4.1/fs/nfs/inode.c Wed Feb 14 01:00:33 2001
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@
inode->i_rdev = 0;
NFS_FILEID(inode) = 0;
NFS_FSID(inode) = 0;
+ NFS_FLAGS(inode) = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->u.nfs_i.read);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->u.nfs_i.dirty);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inode->u.nfs_i.commit);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
