Re: block ioctl to read/write last sector

[Michael E Brown]

Martin,

  It looks like the numbers we picked for our respective IOCTLs conflict.
I think I can change mine to the next higher since your patch seems to
have been around longer. What is the general way to deal with these
conflicts?

--
Michael

On 13 Feb 2001, Martin K. Petersen wrote:

> >>>>> "Andries" == Andries Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andries> Anyway, an ioctl just to read the last sector is too silly.
> Andries> An ioctl to change the blocksize is more reasonable.
>
> I actually sent you a patch implementing this some time ago, remember?
> We need it for XFS...
>
> Patch against 2.4.2-pre3 follows.
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/