>>> Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com> 08/22/12 5:24 AM >>> >On 08/20/2012 10:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >I was thought you have 'Agreed' for xen part code. :)
I had agreed to it being done the right way, and I had pointed out the problem once. I can't say for sure that I looked at the most recent rev closely enough to spot the issue still being unfixed. >> For one, while TLB_FLUSH_ALL gets passed as 'end' argument to >> flush_tlb_others(), the Xen code was made to check its 'start' >> parameter. > >Do you mean need the following change? --untested. Yes. I'd question though whether for that special case it shouldn't be start _and_ end to get passed the special value. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
