Em Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:56:13AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu: > On 8/22/12 10:29 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >Adding the EXEC event, ditto. And I agree that while adding it we want > >to do 1/2 as pre-requisite. > > maps should not be flushed on a COMM event, so that was a mistake. > Given that what new information does an EXEC event provide? Same > process id. A COMM event is generated on an exec, so the name change > happens. Mappings are dropped prior to that - and there is no unmap > event. That seems to be a missing piece. Maps are added which is > handled by MMAP events. After that why is an exec event relevant?
Please read the original discussion about it: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/13/545 - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
