On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 13:58 +0200, Alex Bergmann wrote: > On 08/22/2012 06:41 PM, H.K. Jerry Chu wrote:
> > This issue occurred to me right after I submitted the patch for RFC6298. > > I did not commit any more change because RFC compliance aside, 180secs > > just seem like eternity in the Internet age. > > > > (See my past post on this at > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=130759078118866&w=2) > > Okay, I missed that post during my search about the current situation. I would suggest to increase TCP_SYN_RETRIES from 5 to 6. 180 secs is eternity, but 31 secs is too small. Can you repost a v2, only changing TCP_SYN_RETRIES ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
