From: Paul Turner <p...@google.com>

Since we are now doing bottom up load accumulation we need explicit
notification when a task has been re-parented so that the old hierarchy can be
updated.

Adds: migrate_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu)

(The alternative is to do this out of __set_task_cpu, but it was suggested that
this would be a cleaner encapsulation.)

Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <p...@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bseg...@google.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
 kernel/sched/core.c   |    2 ++
 kernel/sched/fair.c   |   12 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 7406249..93e27c0 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1105,6 +1105,7 @@ struct sched_class {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
        int  (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags);
+       void (*migrate_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu);
 
        void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
        void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 33e6fe1..b3e2442 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -952,6 +952,8 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int 
new_cpu)
        trace_sched_migrate_task(p, new_cpu);
 
        if (task_cpu(p) != new_cpu) {
+               if (p->sched_class->migrate_task_rq)
+                       p->sched_class->migrate_task_rq(p, new_cpu);
                p->se.nr_migrations++;
                perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, NULL, 0);
        }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0ce8d91..e11e24c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3028,6 +3028,17 @@ unlock:
 
        return new_cpu;
 }
+
+/*
+ * Called immediately before a task is migrated to a new cpu; task_cpu(p) and
+ * cfs_rq_of(p) references at time of call are still valid and identify the
+ * previous cpu.  However, the caller only guarantees p->pi_lock is held; no
+ * other assumptions, including the state of rq->lock, should be made.
+ */
+static void
+migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu)
+{
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 static unsigned long
@@ -5591,6 +5602,7 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
        .select_task_rq         = select_task_rq_fair,
+       .migrate_task_rq        = migrate_task_rq_fair,
 
        .rq_online              = rq_online_fair,
        .rq_offline             = rq_offline_fair,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to