[See here for the original patch: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-August/043112.html]
Julia, sorry for long delay, aiaiai gives says that this patch introduced 3 warnings: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Successfully built configuration "arm-spear6xx_defconfig,arm,arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi-", results: --- before_patching.log +++ after_patching.log @@ @@ -drivers/mtd/devices/spear_smi.c: In function 'spear_smi_remove': -drivers/mtd/devices/spear_smi.c:1022:30: warning: variable 'pdata' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] +drivers/mtd/devices/spear_smi.c: In function 'spear_smi_remove': +drivers/mtd/devices/spear_smi.c:1026:9: warning: variable 'irq' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] +drivers/mtd/devices/spear_smi.c:1022:30: warning: variable 'pdata' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] +drivers/mtd/devices/spear_smi.c:1024:19: warning: variable 'smi_base' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 22:36 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> > > Use devm_kzalloc for all calls to kzalloc and not just the first. Use devm > functions for other allocations as well. > > Move the call to platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0) closer to > where its result is passed to devm_request_and_ioremap to make the lack of > need for a NULL test more evident. > > The semantic match that finds the inconsistency is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) ... > @@ -1073,21 +1043,13 @@ static int __devexit spear_smi_remove(struct > platform_device *pdev) > ret = mtd_device_unregister(&flash->mtd); > if (ret) > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error removing mtd\n"); > - > - iounmap(flash->base_addr); > - kfree(flash); > } > > irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > - free_irq(irq, dev); I guess 'platform_get_irq()' should be killed as well? Stefan, this is strange code - we get irq, without checking for error, and then free it? What is the rationale? > clk_disable_unprepare(dev->clk); > - clk_put(dev->clk); > - iounmap(dev->io_base); > - kfree(dev); > > smi_base = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > - release_mem_region(smi_base->start, resource_size(smi_base)); > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); Why do we set platform data to NULL, is this needed? -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
