On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Jiang Liu <liu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pingfan,
>
>         We have realized the same when implementing lock mechanisms for PCI 
> hotplug
> operations, and we are planning to holding a reference to parent bus for each 
> pci dev.

Thanks! You save me from searching such codes.
Regards,
pingfan

>         Regards!
>         Gerry
>
> On 08/23/2012 01:24 PM, Liu ping fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question about the life cycle of pci_dev and its parent pci_bus.
>> In pci_destroy_dev(), we remove the pci_dev from the bus_list, so
>> pci_dev is isolated from its parent pci_bus, and their life cycle are
>> independent too. But it seems that in pci_dev, we can still access the
>> pci_bus from the pointer pci_dev->bus.  To resolve such issue, I think
>> during the pci_dev removal,  there should be process to 1.prevent the
>> reader incoming 2. ensure the current reader has exit.  But can not
>> find them.
>>
>> Could anyone tell me?
>>
>> Thanx, pingfan
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to