On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 08:03:14PM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 08:57:04PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > > > 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > > > > commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 upstream. > > > > We may only start to set up the new register values after having > > confirmed that the ring is truely off. Otherwise the hw might lose the > > newly written register values. This is caught later on in the init > > sequence, when we check whether the register writes have stuck. > > > > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50522 > > Tested-by: Yang Guang <guang.a.y...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > I think with this commit also the following commits should be picked for > 3.4 right? (as suggested for 3.0): > > f01db988ef6f6c70a6cc36ee71e4a98a68901229 > b7884eb45ec98c0d34c7f49005ae9d4b4b4e38f6 > > Just reporting that I tested this 3.4.10 proposed update with the two > commits above cherry-picked/backported applied, and worked ok.
3.4.10 as-is works fine for me, so I'm a bit leary of wanting to add more patches to it (or 3.0.42), until I get some kind of confirmation that these two patches are really needed. Anyone else having problems here? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
