On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:07:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi1_ipg_gate], NULL, "63fcc000.ssi"); > > > clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi2_ipg_gate], NULL, "50014000.ssi"); > > > clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi3_ipg_gate], NULL, "63fd0000.ssi"); > > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm1_ipg_gate], "ipg", "53fb4000.pwm"); > > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm1_hf_gate], "per", "53fb4000.pwm"); > > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm2_ipg_gate], "ipg", "53fb8000.pwm"); > > > + clk_register_clkdev(clk[pwm2_hf_gate], "per", "53fb8000.pwm"); > > > > It should be in a separate patch? > > Should it? Surely I can do this, I had the feeling though that it > belongs together. > >From patch subject, I do not expect these changes in the patch. It's okay to have it but we need a more proper patch subject then.
-- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
