On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:56:21AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> The increment_cpu_stall_ticks() function listed each RCU flavor
> explicitly, with an ifdef to handle preemptible RCU.  This commit
> therefore applies for_each_rcu_flavor() to save a line of code.

And also mysteriously changes __get_cpu_var to __this_cpu_var without
documenting that (or the reason for it) in the commit message. :)

> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |    9 ++++-----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 3ea60c9..139a803 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -2196,11 +2196,10 @@ static void zero_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  /* Increment ->ticks_this_gp for all flavors of RCU. */
>  static void increment_cpu_stall_ticks(void)
>  {
> -     __get_cpu_var(rcu_sched_data).ticks_this_gp++;
> -     __get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data).ticks_this_gp++;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> -     __get_cpu_var(rcu_preempt_data).ticks_this_gp++;
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
> +     struct rcu_state *rsp;
> +
> +     for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> +             __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)->ticks_this_gp++;
>  }
>  
>  #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
> -- 
> 1.7.8
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to