On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:05:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> 
> RCU currently insists that only idle tasks can enter RCU idle mode, which
> prohibits an adaptive tickless kernel (AKA nohz cpusets), which in turn
> would mean that usermode execution would always take scheduling-clock
> interrupts, even when there is only one task runnable on the CPU in
> question.
> 
> This commit therefore adds rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user_exit(), which
> allow non-idle tasks to enter RCU idle mode.  These are quite similar
> to rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit(), respectively, except that they
> omit the idle-task checks.
> 
> [ Updated to use "user" flag rather than separate check functions. ]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
> Cc: Geoff Levand <[email protected]>
> Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <[email protected]>
> Cc: Hakan Akkan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Max Krasnyansky <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

A few suggestions below: an optional microoptimization and some bugfixes.
With the bugfixes, and with or without the microoptimization:

Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>

> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
[...]
> -static void rcu_idle_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long 
> oldval)
> +static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> +                             bool user)
>  {
>       trace_rcu_dyntick("Start", oldval, 0);
> -     if (!is_idle_task(current)) {
> +     if (!is_idle_task(current) && !user) {

Microoptimization: putting the !user check first (here and in the exit
function) would allow the compiler to partially inline rcu_eqs_*_common
into the two trivial wrappers and constant-fold away the test for !user.

> +void rcu_idle_enter(void)
> +{
> +     rcu_eqs_enter(0);
> +}

s/0/false/

> +void rcu_user_enter(void)
> +{
> +     rcu_eqs_enter(1);
> +}

s/1/true/

> -static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
> +static void rcu_eqs_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> +                            int user)
>  {
>       smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();  /* Force ordering w/previous sojourn. */
>       atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
> @@ -464,7 +490,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks 
> *rdtp, long long oldval)
>       WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
>       rcu_cleanup_after_idle(smp_processor_id());
>       trace_rcu_dyntick("End", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
> -     if (!is_idle_task(current)) {
> +     if (!is_idle_task(current) && !user) {

Same micro-optimization as the enter function.

> +void rcu_idle_exit(void)
> +{
> +     rcu_eqs_exit(0);
> +}

s/0/false/

> +void rcu_user_exit(void)
> +{
> +     rcu_eqs_exit(1);
> +}

s/1/true/

> @@ -539,7 +586,7 @@ void rcu_irq_enter(void)
>       if (oldval)
>               trace_rcu_dyntick("++=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
>       else
> -             rcu_idle_exit_common(rdtp, oldval);
> +             rcu_eqs_exit_common(rdtp, oldval, 1);

s/1/true/, and likewise in rcu_irq_exit.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to