On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:47:50PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > You still miss wakeups. :)
> 
> And there was another race in it, I know.  The first __set_task_state
> has to be set_task_state to get the right memory write order on SMP. 

If the wakeup is serialized by the spinlock too (as your code looks like to
assume) you can legally use __set_task_state instead of set_task_state.  An
example of such an usage (where wakeup is serialized by the spinlock) is
lock_sock/unlock_sock.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to