On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:18:21AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Then rcu_gp_kthread() function is too large and furthermore needs to
> have the force_quiescent_state() code pulled in.  This commit therefore
> breaks up rcu_gp_kthread() into rcu_gp_init() and rcu_gp_cleanup().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>

>  kernel/rcutree.c |  260 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 84a6f55..c2c036f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1040,160 +1040,176 @@ rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct 
> rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_dat
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Body of kthread that handles grace periods.
> + * Initialize a new grace period.
>   */
> -static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
> +static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  {
>       unsigned long flags;
> -     unsigned long gp_duration;
>       struct rcu_data *rdp;
> -     struct rcu_node *rnp;
> -     struct rcu_state *rsp = arg;
> +     struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
>  
> -     for (;;) {
> +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +     rsp->gp_flags = 0;
>  
> -             /* Handle grace-period start. */
> -             rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
> -             for (;;) {
> -                     wait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq, rsp->gp_flags);
> -                     if (rsp->gp_flags)
> -                             break;
> -                     flush_signals(current);
> -             }
> +     if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
> +             /* Grace period already in progress, don't start another. */
> +             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (rsp->fqs_active) {
> +             /*
> +              * We need a grace period, but force_quiescent_state()
> +              * is running.  Tell it to start one on our behalf.
> +              */
> +             rsp->fqs_need_gp = 1;
> +             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Advance to a new grace period and initialize state. */
> +     rsp->gpnum++;
> +     trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->gpnum, "start");
> +     WARN_ON_ONCE(rsp->fqs_state == RCU_GP_INIT);
> +     rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_INIT; /* Stop force_quiescent_state. */
> +     rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
> +     record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
> +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +
> +     /* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
> +     get_online_cpus();
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
> +      * structures for all currently online CPUs in breadth-first order,
> +      * starting from the root rcu_node structure, relying on the layout
> +      * of the tree within the rsp->node[] array.  Note that other CPUs
> +      * access only the leaves of the hierarchy, thus seeing that no
> +      * grace period is in progress, at least until the corresponding
> +      * leaf node has been initialized.  In addition, we have excluded
> +      * CPU-hotplug operations.
> +      *
> +      * The grace period cannot complete until the initialization
> +      * process finishes, because this kthread handles both.
> +      */
> +     rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
>               raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -             rsp->gp_flags = 0;
>               rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> +             rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
> +             rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
> +             rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> +             rnp->completed = rsp->completed;
> +             if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
> +                     rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(rsp, rnp, rdp);
> +             rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(rnp);
> +             trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
> +                                         rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
> +                                         rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
> +             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +             cond_resched();
> +     }
>  
> -             if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
> -                     /*
> -                      * A grace period is already in progress, so
> -                      * don't start another one.
> -                      */
> -                     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -                     cond_resched();
> -                     continue;
> -             }
> +     rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
> +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +     /* force_quiescent_state() now OK. */
> +     rsp->fqs_state = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT;
> +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +     put_online_cpus();
>  
> -             if (rsp->fqs_active) {
> -                     /*
> -                      * We need a grace period, but force_quiescent_state()
> -                      * is running.  Tell it to start one on our behalf.
> -                      */
> -                     rsp->fqs_need_gp = 1;
> -                     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -                     cond_resched();
> -                     continue;
> -             }
> +     return 1;
> +}
>  
> -             /* Advance to a new grace period and initialize state. */
> -             rsp->gpnum++;
> -             trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->gpnum, "start");
> -             WARN_ON_ONCE(rsp->fqs_state == RCU_GP_INIT);
> -             rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_INIT; /* Stop force_quiescent_state. */
> -             rsp->jiffies_force_qs = jiffies + RCU_JIFFIES_TILL_FORCE_QS;
> -             record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
> -             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +/*
> + * Clean up after the old grace period.
> + */
> +static int rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> +{
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     unsigned long gp_duration;
> +     struct rcu_data *rdp;
> +     struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
>  
> -             /* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
> -             get_online_cpus();
> +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +     gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start;
> +     if (gp_duration > rsp->gp_max)
> +             rsp->gp_max = gp_duration;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * We know the grace period is complete, but to everyone else
> +      * it appears to still be ongoing.  But it is also the case
> +      * that to everyone else it looks like there is nothing that
> +      * they can do to advance the grace period.  It is therefore
> +      * safe for us to drop the lock in order to mark the grace
> +      * period as completed in all of the rcu_node structures.
> +      *
> +      * But if this CPU needs another grace period, it will take
> +      * care of this while initializing the next grace period.
> +      * We use RCU_WAIT_TAIL instead of the usual RCU_DONE_TAIL
> +      * because the callbacks have not yet been advanced: Those
> +      * callbacks are waiting on the grace period that just now
> +      * completed.
> +      */
> +     rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> +     if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] == NULL) {
> +             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
>  
>               /*
> -              * Set the quiescent-state-needed bits in all the rcu_node
> -              * structures for all currently online CPUs in breadth-first
> -              * order, starting from the root rcu_node structure.
> -              * This operation relies on the layout of the hierarchy
> -              * within the rsp->node[] array.  Note that other CPUs will
> -              * access only the leaves of the hierarchy, which still
> -              * indicate that no grace period is in progress, at least
> -              * until the corresponding leaf node has been initialized.
> -              * In addition, we have excluded CPU-hotplug operations.
> -              *
> -              * Note that the grace period cannot complete until
> -              * we finish the initialization process, as there will
> -              * be at least one qsmask bit set in the root node until
> -              * that time, namely the one corresponding to this CPU,
> -              * due to the fact that we have irqs disabled.
> +              * Propagate new ->completed value to rcu_node
> +              * structures so that other CPUs don't have to
> +              * wait until the start of the next grace period
> +              * to process their callbacks.
>                */
>               rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
>                       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -                     rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
> -                     rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
> -                     rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> -                     rnp->completed = rsp->completed;
> -                     if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
> -                             rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(rsp, rnp, rdp);
> -                     rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(rnp);
> -                     trace_rcu_grace_period_init(rsp->name, rnp->gpnum,
> -                                                 rnp->level, rnp->grplo,
> -                                                 rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
> +                     rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
>                       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
>                       cond_resched();
>               }
> -
>               rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
>               raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -             /* force_quiescent_state() now OK. */
> -             rsp->fqs_state = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT;
> -             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -             put_online_cpus();
> +     }
> +
> +     rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum; /* Declare grace period done. */
> +     trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, "end");
> +     rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
> +     rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> +     if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp))
> +             rsp->gp_flags = 1;
> +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> +     return 1;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Body of kthread that handles grace periods.
> + */
> +static int rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
> +{
> +     struct rcu_state *rsp = arg;
> +     struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
> +
> +     for (;;) {
> +
> +             /* Handle grace-period start. */
> +             for (;;) {
> +                     wait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq, rsp->gp_flags);
> +                     if (rsp->gp_flags && rcu_gp_init(rsp))
> +                             break;
> +                     cond_resched();
> +                     flush_signals(current);
> +             }
>  
>               /* Handle grace-period end. */
> -             rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
>               for (;;) {
>                       wait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq,
>                                                !ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
>                                                
> !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp));
>                       if (!ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
> -                         !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
> +                         !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp) &&
> +                         rcu_gp_cleanup(rsp))
>                               break;
> +                     cond_resched();
>                       flush_signals(current);
>               }
> -
> -             raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -             gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start;
> -             if (gp_duration > rsp->gp_max)
> -                     rsp->gp_max = gp_duration;
> -
> -             /*
> -              * We know the grace period is complete, but to everyone else
> -              * it appears to still be ongoing.  But it is also the case
> -              * that to everyone else it looks like there is nothing that
> -              * they can do to advance the grace period.  It is therefore
> -              * safe for us to drop the lock in order to mark the grace
> -              * period as completed in all of the rcu_node structures.
> -              *
> -              * But if this CPU needs another grace period, it will take
> -              * care of this while initializing the next grace period.
> -              * We use RCU_WAIT_TAIL instead of the usual RCU_DONE_TAIL
> -              * because the callbacks have not yet been advanced: Those
> -              * callbacks are waiting on the grace period that just now
> -              * completed.
> -              */
> -             if (*rdp->nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL] == NULL) {
> -                     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -
> -                     /*
> -                      * Propagate new ->completed value to rcu_node
> -                      * structures so that other CPUs don't have to
> -                      * wait until the start of the next grace period
> -                      * to process their callbacks.
> -                      */
> -                     rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
> -                             raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -                             rnp->completed = rsp->gpnum;
> -                             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -                             cond_resched();
> -                     }
> -                     rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
> -                     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> -             }
> -
> -             rsp->completed = rsp->gpnum; /* Declare grace period done. */
> -             trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->completed, "end");
> -             rsp->fqs_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
> -             if (cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp))
> -                     rsp->gp_flags = 1;
> -             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
>       }
>       return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.8
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to