On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:40:09PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, Michal Marek wrote: > > > > > On 5.9.2012 15:05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Thanks for your reply, > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > > >> Adding Max to CC. > > > >> > > > >> On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > >>> Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three > > > >>> packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When > > > >>> cross-building > > > >>> it gives me an error: > > > >>> > > > >>> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > > > >>> appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > > > >>> > > > >>> Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been > > > >>> replaced with dpkg-architecture. > > > >>> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com> > > > >>> --- > > > >>> scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +-- > > > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > >>> > > > >>> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb > > > >>> index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644 > > > >>> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb > > > >>> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb > > > >>> @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir" > > > >>> (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd > > > >>> $destdir; tar -xf -) > > > >>> ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" > > > >>> "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build" > > > >>> rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles" > > > >>> -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) > > > >>> > > > >>> cat <<EOF >> debian/control > > > >>> > > > >>> Package: $kernel_headers_packagename > > > >>> Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6 > > > >>> -Architecture: $arch > > > >>> +Architecture: any > > > >>> Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch > > > >>> This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on > > > >>> $arch > > > >>> . > > > >> > > > >> As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that > > > >> this is a valid change. > > > > > > > > But you optionally force the Architecture later on in build_package. > > > > "Arhcitecture: any" in the source package states that the binary package > > > > will be the one stated by the build system. > > > > > > Ah, OK. I don't know much about Debian packaging in fact. Max, could you > > > have a look? The original thread is here: > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/14/133. I meant to add you to CC before, > > > but apparently I forgot. > > > > yes indeed it is an invalid change. > > Cross building shouldn't need it, what did you exactly try? > > $ grep CROSS_COMPILE .config > CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE="arm-linux-gnueabihf-" > > Command: > > KBUILD_DEBARCH=armhf make ARCH=arm KBUILD_IMAGE=uImage deb-pkg > > Error I get: > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not > appear in package's architecture list (amd64) > > It seems I have to use KBUILD_DEBARCH, as the kernel build system can't > really tell if I want armel or armhf (If I built the same kernel for a > Squeeze system I would have been forced to use armel).
well, obviously the dpkg call in -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture) is wrong please fix that. thanks. -- maks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
