On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 03:08:48PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > good commercial drivers dont need fixing. another point. You are arguing > that having source is required to fix crappy code, which i agree with. Too bad we havn't seen much (any?) good closed-source (what you ment to say when you said commercial above) drivers for Linux, including the steaming pile of garbage your company ships. > You "guys" like to have source, and there is nothing wrong with that. But > requiring that all code be distributed as source DOES stifle innovation. > Its as simple as that. Like Microsoft you seem to confuse 'innovation' with 'being able to dictate the terms of how I will extort money from others'. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dennis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... James A. Sutherland
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Alan Olsen
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dr. Kelsey Hudson
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... rjd
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dennis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Bob Taylor
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Stefan Smietanowski
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Augustin Vidovic
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Roeland Th. Jansen
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dr. Kelsey Hudson
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Augustin Vidovic