chained_irq_enter/exit() already mask&ack/unmask the chained interrupt.
There is no need to also explicitly do it in the handler.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c |    7 -------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index 4eb39cd..0a85aec 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -965,14 +965,7 @@ static void exynos_irq_eint0_15(unsigned int irq, struct 
irq_desc *desc)
        struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(irq);
 
        chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
-       chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data);
-
-       if (chip->irq_ack)
-               chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
-
        generic_handle_irq(*irq_data);
-
-       chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
        chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to