On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:38:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 11:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY
> > + udelay(10); /* Make preemption more probable. */
> cond_resched(); /* for extra fun? */
The additional fun could include "scheduling while atomic", so I will
pass. ;-)
(The problem is that __rcu_read_unlock() can be called with interrupts
disabled, among other things.)
Thanx, Paul
> > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY */
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
