On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 07:47 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 07:24:41AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:09:40PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 11:54 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > Not sure I see much difference in aesthetics between the three > > > > > approaches, > > > > > > but am willing to switch over to a generally agreed-upon scheme. > > > > > > > > > > Steve, could I get an ack from you on the patch I sent? > > > > > > > > I acked it, but do you just want me to take the patch? I'm getting ready > > > > for another 3.7 push to tip. > > > > > > Up to Paul. What would make it easiest to coordinate that patch and the > > > corresponding bits in the RCU patch series? > > > > All I need to do is to eventually remove the exports, correct? > > If so, full speed ahead! > > Sounds like you could go ahead and remove the exports now, and just make > sure Steve's push goes in before yours. >
Is there any rush to do this? I just plan on pushing it for 3.7. Paul, you just push your changes through tip, right? Then we can just let Ingo know. I could even make the patch a separate branch, that Ingo can pull into the RCU branch too. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
