On 09/10/2012 10:02 AM, Kim, Milo wrote:
>  TI LP8788 PMU provides regulators, battery charger, ADC,
>  RTC, backlight driver and current sinks.
> 
>  This patch enables the LP8788 ADC functions.
> 
>  The LP8788 ADC has 13 ADC input selection and supports 12-bit resolution.
>  Internal operation of getting ADC is access to registers of LP8788.
>  The LP8788 ADC uses exported functions for accessing these registers.
>  (exported by LP8788 MFD device driver)
> 
>  This driver supports IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW and SCALE.
>  The scale is micro unit.
>  So the IIO consumer can get the result as following.
> 
>    result = ADC raw value * (scale_int + scale_part / 1000000)
> 
>  (The IIO map for the IIO consumer)
> 
>  The ADC input can be selective in the platform side.
>  Even though this platform data is not defined,
>  the default IIO map is created for supporting the power supply driver.
>  The battery voltage and temperature are used inside this driver.
> 


Hi,

One issue and a couple of nitpicks inline.

> Signed-off-by: Milo(Woogyom) Kim <milo....@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig      |    6 +
>  drivers/iio/adc/Makefile     |    1 +
>  drivers/iio/adc/lp8788_adc.c |  270 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 277 insertions(+)
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/lp8788_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/lp8788_adc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6079f9e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/lp8788_adc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
[...]
> +
> +static const int lp8788_scale[LPADC_MAX] = {
> +     [LPADC_VBATT_5P5] = 1343,
> +     [LPADC_VIN_CHG]   = 3052,
> +     [LPADC_IBATT]     = 610,
> +     [LPADC_IC_TEMP]   = 610,
> +     [LPADC_VBATT_6P0] = 1465,
> +     [LPADC_VBATT_5P0] = 1221,
> +     [LPADC_ADC1]      = 610,
> +     [LPADC_ADC2]      = 610,
> +     [LPADC_VDD]       = 1025,
> +     [LPADC_VCOIN]     = 757,
> +     [LPADC_VDD_LDO]   = 610,
> +     [LPADC_ADC3]      = 610,
> +     [LPADC_ADC4]      = 610,
> +};
> +
[...]
> +static int lp8788_adc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +                     struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> +                     int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> +{
> +     struct lp8788_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +     enum lp8788_adc_id id = chan->channel;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&adc->lock);
> +
> +     switch (mask) {
> +     case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> +             ret = lp8788_get_adc_result(adc, id, val) ? -EIO : IIO_VAL_INT;
> +             break;
> +     case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> +             *val = (lp8788_scale[id] / 1000) * 1000;
> +             *val2 = (lp8788_scale[id] % 1000) * 1000000;

This looks suspicious. E.g. if the entry in your table has the value "1234"
you'd end up with a scale factor of 1000.234000000. Which looks wrong for
two reasons, given that you return INT_PLUS_MICRO val2 should never exceed 6
decimal digits and secondly val is multiplied by a factor of thousand.

Can you tell us in what unit the values in lp8788_scale are, that would make
review easier.

> +             ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             ret = -EINVAL;
> +             break;
> +     }
> +
> +     mutex_unlock(&adc->lock);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_info lp8788_adc_info = {
> +     .read_raw = &lp8788_adc_read_raw,
> +     .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +#define LP8788_CHAN(_id, _type) {                            \
> +             .type = _type,                                  \
> +             .indexed = 1,                                   \
> +             .channel = LPADC_##_id,                         \
> +             .info_mask = IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW_SEPARATE_BIT |   \
> +                     IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE_SEPARATE_BIT,       \
> +             .address = LP8788_ADC_RAW,                      \
> +             .scan_type = IIO_ST('u', 12, 16, 0),            \
> +             .scan_index = 1,                                \
> +             .datasheet_name = "LP8788_"#_id,                        \

I'd drop the "LP8788_" prefix.

> +}
> +
[...]
> +static int lp8788_iio_map_register(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +                             struct lp8788_platform_data *pdata,
> +                             struct lp8788_adc *adc)
> +{
> +     struct iio_map *map;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     map = !pdata || !pdata->adc_pdata ?

This could use a pair of parenthesis.

> +             lp8788_default_iio_maps : pdata->adc_pdata;
> +
> +     ret = iio_map_array_register(indio_dev, map);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             dev_err(adc->lp->dev, "iio map err: %d\n", ret);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
> +     adc->map = map;
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +

[...]
> +static int __devexit lp8788_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct iio_dev *indio_dev =  platform_get_drvdata(pdev);

extra space.

> +     struct lp8788_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +     iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> +     lp8788_iio_map_unregister(indio_dev, adc);
> +     iio_device_free(indio_dev);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to