On 9/11/2012 7:54 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: >> On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >>> Just curious to know how you came with some of the above header names ? >>> >>> plat/mcbsp ---> dsp-mcbsp.h >>> There is no connection of DSP with McBSP. "omap-mcbsp.h" would been a >>> better name. >> >> This one was a mistake on my side, as Tony and Peter already pointed out. >> How about asoc-mcbsp.h or asoc-omap-mcbsp.h? >> > After re-reading the cover-letter and your below response, > 'asoc-omap-mcbsp.h' seems to be fine. >
Note that mcbsp is also applicable to Davinci family of devices. Thanks, Vaibhav >>> plat/nand.h --> /mtd-nand-omap2.h >>> plat/onenand.h --> /mtd-onenand-omap2.h >>> May be "omap-nand.h" and "omap-onenand.h" >>> >>> plat/mcspi.h-->spi-omap2-mcspi.h >>> May be "omap-spi.h" >>> >> >> As I wrote in the introductory mail, I tried to always prefix the file >> names with the subsystem, followed by the name of the driver, in order >> to standardize on just one set of rules. >> > Just read that now. > >> The drivers implementing the three headers above are: >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c >> drivers/mtd/onenand/omap2.c >> drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c >> >> so these all seem appropriate. >> > Sorry I missed the subsystem prefix point. > These names seems to be fine then. > > Regards > Santosh > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
