On 09/13/2012 06:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:56:41 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> To make the code more clear, move release the lock out of 
>> khugepaged_alloc_page
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -1854,11 +1854,6 @@ static struct page
>>      *hpage  = alloc_hugepage_vma(khugepaged_defrag(), vma, address,
>>                                    node, __GFP_OTHER_NODE);
>>
>> -    /*
>> -     * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> -     * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> -     */
>> -    up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>      if (unlikely(!*hpage)) {
>>              count_vm_event(THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED);
>>              *hpage = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> @@ -1905,7 +1900,6 @@ static struct page
>>                     struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>                     int node)
>>  {
>> -    up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>      VM_BUG_ON(!*hpage);
>>      return  *hpage;
>>  }
>> @@ -1931,8 +1925,14 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>
>>      VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>
>> -    /* release the mmap_sem read lock. */
>>      new_page = khugepaged_alloc_page(hpage, mm, vma, address, node);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> +     * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> +     */
>> +    up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> +
>>      if (!new_page)
>>              return;
> 
> Well that's a pretty minor improvement: one still has to go off on a
> big hunt to locate the matching down_read().
> 
> And the patch will increase mmap_sem hold times by a teeny amount.  Do
> we really want to do this?

Andrew,

This is why i did in the previous patch (the lock is released in alloc 
function),
but as you noticed, this is really teeny overload after this patch - only 
increase
the load of count_vm_event() which operates a cpu-local variable. And, before i
posted this patch, i did kerbench test, no regression was found.

The another approach is, let the function name indicate the lock will be 
released,
how about just change the function name to khugepaged_alloc_page_release_lock?






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to