On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 10:19 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: 
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 08:49 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:11 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: 
> > > On tickless system, one CPU runs load balance for all idle CPUs.
> > > The cpu_load of this CPU is updated before starting the load balance
> > > of each other idle CPUs. We should instead update the cpu_load of the 
> > > balance_cpu.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guit...@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/sched/fair.c |   11 ++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > index 1ca4fe4..9ae3a5b 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > @@ -4794,14 +4794,15 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(int this_cpu, enum 
> > > cpu_idle_type idle)
> > >           if (need_resched())
> > >                   break;
> > >  
> > > -         raw_spin_lock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
> > > -         update_rq_clock(this_rq);
> > > -         update_idle_cpu_load(this_rq);
> > > -         raw_spin_unlock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
> > > +         rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu);
> > > +
> > > +         raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> > > +         update_rq_clock(rq);
> > > +         update_idle_cpu_load(rq);
> > > +         raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
> > >  
> > >           rebalance_domains(balance_cpu, CPU_IDLE);
> > >  
> > > -         rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu);
> > >           if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, rq->next_balance))
> > >                   this_rq->next_balance = rq->next_balance;
> > >   }
> > 
> > Ew, banging locks and updating clocks to what good end?
> 
> Well, updating the load statistics on the cpu you're going to balance
> seems like a good end to me.. ;-) No point updating the local statistics
> N times and leaving the ones you're going to balance stale for god knows
> how long.

Sure, the goal is fine, but I wonder about the price vs payoff.  I was
thinking perhaps the redundant updates should go away instead, unless
stats are shown to be causing real world pain.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to