On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 10:57 +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > > > + aif_ctrl |= (DA9055_AIF_OE | DA9055_AIF_EN); > > DAPM.
Here the trouble in making it DAPM based is that there is no separate control for AIF input and output. It is confirmed that AIF_EN is the master control bit, which enables both output as well as input. The AIF _OE bit is redundant. If we use the same control bit(i.e AIF_EN) for both DAPM_AIF_IN and DAPM_AIF_OUT, there will be obvious side effects. Is there any other way to take care of this? Or should we leave it outside DAPM? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
