On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:43:12PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:55:29PM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > From: Jens Taprogge <jens.tapro...@taprogge.org>
> > 
> > This way interrupt handling becomes independent of the channel number.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.tapro...@taprogge.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <sigles...@igalia.com>
> > ---
> > @@ -213,7 +206,7 @@ static int ipoctal_irq_handler(void *arg)
> >             }
> >  
> >             /* RX data */
> > -           if (isr_rx_rdy && (sr & SR_RX_READY)) {
> > +           if ((isr && channel->isr_rx_rdy_mask) && (sr & SR_RX_READY)) {
>                          ^^
> Bitwise AND intended here I think.
> 

Never mind.  It gets silently fixed in the next patch.

Regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to