Hi all, I have noticed that we use the following paradigm quite a bit theses days:
config <something
select HAVE_<config1>
config <config1>
depends on HAVE_<config1>
or similar
I was wondering if it would make sense to replace this with:
config <something
enable <config1>
config <config1>
depends on enabled
The advantage of this is that we would not have all the HAVE_ config
names in our .config files and the generated include files. Of course,
if config1 does not depend on "enabled", then the "enable <config1>"
would have no effect (we may want to warn about this).
Comments?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
pgp4wo7Qsj6Jg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
