> > Now there is: > > git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git preview-for-next > > OK from having a glimpse, I'd prefer to squash (or have squashed) > > i2c: nomadik: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver > i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device Tree
Sure, no problem > Documentation: Device Tree binding information for i2c-nomadik driver > (Documentation should go along with the code) I'm still not too sure about how this benefits anyone. You can ensure the documentation is placed in an adjacent patch, so it's just as easy to make reference to. > into one patch and take that via the I2C tree. This will allow me to > resolve the merge conflict in my tree on my own. I don't see a strong > reason to have those go via arm-soc (like prevented build-failures or > easier merges), if I missed such a reason, please let me know. I don't have any good reasons for you not to take the patch(es) though your tree. Please go ahead. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
