Hello, Lai.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:40:05AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> try_to_grab_pending() leave LINKED tagalong in delayed queue when
> it deletes a work. This behavior will cause future
> cwq_activate_first_delayed() increase the ->nr_active wrongly,
> and may cause the whole cwq frozen.
> 
> example:
> 
> state:        cwq->max_active = 1, cwq->nr_active = 1
>       one work in cwq->pool, many in cwq->delayed_works.
> 
> step1:        try_to_grab_pending() remove a work from delayed_works but 
> leave tagalong.
> step2:        when the work in cwq->pool is finished, 
> cwq_activate_first_delayed()
>       move the tagalong to cwq->pool and increase the ->nr_active.
> 
> current state: cwq->nr_active = 1, but works of the cwq in cwq->pool are all 
> NO_COLOR,
>       so even when these works are finished, cwq->nr_active will not be 
> decreased,
>       and no work will be moved from cwq->delayed_works. the cwq is frozen.
> 
> Fix it by moving the tagalong to cwq->pool in try_to_grab_pending().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>

Nice spotting.

> @@ -1101,11 +1101,26 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct 
> *work, bool is_dwork,
>                */
>               smp_rmb();
>               if (gcwq == get_work_gcwq(work)) {
> +                     unsigned long delayed;
> +
> +                     /*
> +                      * move LINKED tagalong(if exist) out from
> +                      * delayed queue. Otherwise some future
> +                      * cwq_activate_first_delayed() may move
> +                      * works(which are all NO_COLOR) to cwq->pool
> +                      * and increase the ->nr_active. It may
> +                      * cause the whole cwq frozen.
> +                      */
> +                     delayed = *work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_DELAYED;
> +                     if (delayed)
> +                             move_linked_works(work,
> +                                     &get_work_cwq(work)->pool->worklist,
> +                                     NULL);
> +
>                       debug_work_deactivate(work);
>                       list_del_init(&work->entry);
>                       cwq_dec_nr_in_flight(get_work_cwq(work),
> -                             get_work_color(work),
> -                             *work_data_bits(work) & WORK_STRUCT_DELAYED);
> +                             get_work_color(work), delayed);

I'm a bit uneasy about how this introduces something which is on
active list but not quite active.  Can we first activate it and then
grab its pending?  IOW, change cwq_activate_first_delayed() to
cwq_activate_delayed() which takes @work instead and then call it with
the work item being grabbed in try_to_grab_pending() before dec'ing
nr_in_flight?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to