* Tony Lindgren <[email protected]> [120916 13:39]: > * Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> [120915 13:15]: > > On Saturday 15 September 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > With my patches, this is now all omap1 specific and > > > moved to arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/hardware.h. > > > It's probably easiest to just update this patch on > > > top of the hardware.h changes I've done. > > > > Yes, sounds good. Do you want to send a patch for that > > and let me drop this one then? > > Yes I can pick this one and update it against one of my > branches to avoid merge conflicts.
This applies against mach-omap1/include/mach/hardware.h with some fuzz so no issues there. But I think we should not apply it as these are physical addresses, not virtual addresses for omap1. We have IOMEM already in use for omap_read/write because of: #define OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS(pa) IOMEM((pa) - OMAP1_IO_OFFSET) I think the right solution is to eventually get rid of omap_read/write for omap1 also and replace them with ioremap + readl/writel. Or am I missing something? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
