On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > Any better/other ideas ? Is the problem that we have to increase the wait > > time, > > or is something else going on ? > > No, it makes sense now that I got the right number of zeroes. ;-) > > So, to be explicit, this is the patch I would like to go in. It is > completely safe, back-portable, and a no-brainer. Parag, are you ok > with being the author on this one? > > Thanks, > Henrik > > From 868fc42edcb3a338ce0a0334e2dc50b01a7f6844 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Parag Warudkar <parag.l...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:49:55 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] applesmc: Bump max wait > > A heavy-load test on a MacBookPro6,1 is still showing a substantial > amount of read errors. Increasing the maximum wait time to 128 ms > resolves the issue. > > maybe-Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.l...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydb...@euromail.se>
Applied after s/maybe-//. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
